Interesting ruling by the first section of the Court of Cassation, where the following concept is reiterated:
"...The withdrawal of a bank from a credit line relationship in which the limit of the credit facility granted has not been exceeded, even though it is contractually provided for even in the absence of just cause, must be considered unlawful, by reason of an interpretation of the contract according to good faith, where in concrete terms it takes on connotations that are wholly unexpected and arbitrary, in contrast, that is to say, with the reasonable expectation of a person who, on the basis of the bank's usual dealings and the absolute commercial normality of those dealings, has reckoned on being able to dispose of the profitable provision for the period of time envisaged and is not, therefore, ready to repay the sums used at any time. The debtor who acts to have the arbitrariness of the termination declared has the burden of alleging the unreasonableness of the justifications given by the bank, demonstrating the sufficiency of its patrimonial security as resulting from the acts of disposition carried out...".
